ESSENCE OF A REPLY BRIEF

The essence of a reply brief is not to reopen argument already canvassed. It is to reply to new issues that have arisen in the respondents brief of argument. — P.A. Galumje, JSC. Was this dictum helpful? Yes 0 No 0...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

A REPLY BRIEF CAN ONLY CONTAIN REPLIES TO NEW ISSUES RAISED BY RESPONDENT

It is not my understanding of the law of brief writing that a reply brief seeks a different relief outside the main brief. A reply brief, as the name implies, is a reply to the respondent’s brief. A reply brief is filed when an issue of law or arguments raised in the respondent’s brief call...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

PURPOSE OF A REPLY BRIEF

A Reply Brief is meant to explain or contest fresh issue of law raised in the Respondents brief, which was not canvassed in/by the Appellants Brief. – Mbaba JCA. Aduba v. Aduba (2018) Was this dictum helpful? Yes 0 No 0...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

A REPLY ON POINTS OF LAW IS NOT MEANT FOR RE-ARGUING ONE’S CASE

A reply on points of law is meant to be just what it is, a reply on points of law. It is not meant for the party replying on points of law to reargue its case or bring in points it forgot to advance when it filed its final written address. A reply on points of law is thus not meant to improve on the quality of a written address; it is not a repair kit to correct or put right an error or lacuna in the initial brief of argument. See Dr Augustine N. Mozie & ors v. Chike Mbamalu [2006] 12 SCM (Pt. I) 306; [2006] 27 NSCQR 425, Basinco Motors Limited v. Woermann Line & anor [2009] 13 NWLR (Pt. 1157) 149; [2009] 8 SCM 103, Ecobank (Nig) Ltd v. Anchorage Leisures Ltd & ors [2016] LPELR-40220(CA), UBA Plc v. Ubokolo [2009] LPELR-8923(CA) and Musaconi Ltd v. Aspinall [2013] LPELR-20745(SC).

— B.B. Kanyip, J. Awogu v TFG Real Estate (2018) – NICN/LA/262/2013

Was this dictum helpful?

FUNCTION OF A REPLY BRIEF

The function of a reply brief is to refute the new arguments in the respondents brief. A reply brief is necessary when an issue of law or argument is raised in the Respondents brief which requires a reply by the appellant. Failure to file a Reply brief can adversely affect the case of the appellant...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

NEW FACTS CANNOT BE INTRODUCED VIA A PETITIONER’S REPLY

It is therefore clear that paragraph 16(1) of the First Schedule to the Electoral Act does not permit a Petitioner in his Reply to introduce or bring in any new issue or fact which ought to have been raised in the petition itself. In other words, a Petitioner cannot in the guise of a Reply...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

REPLY BRIEF IS NOT FOR CORRECTING ERRORS IN MAIN BRIEF

Reach more audience. Place advert here.

Was this dictum helpful?

ESSENCE OF A REPLY BRIEF

Membership Required

A REPLY BRIEF CAN ONLY CONTAIN REPLIES TO NEW ISSUES RAISED BY RESPONDENT

Membership Required

PURPOSE OF A REPLY BRIEF

Membership Required

A REPLY ON POINTS OF LAW IS NOT MEANT FOR RE-ARGUING ONE’S CASE

Was this dictum helpful?

FUNCTION OF A REPLY BRIEF

Membership Required

NEW FACTS CANNOT BE INTRODUCED VIA A PETITIONER’S REPLY

Membership Required