Judiciary-Poetry-Logo
JPoetry

NOTICE OF APPEAL MUST BE SERVED PERSONALLY

Dictum

By Order 2 Rule 3 (1) (b) of the Supreme Court Rules, Notice of Appeal is required to be served personally. This Court has in a number of cases held that the Notice of Appeal is an originating process and failure to serve same personally on a Respondent constitutes a fundamental vice which renders the appeal incompetent as this Court will be deprived of the jurisdiction to entertain the appeal in any form whatsoever except to make an order to strike out the said appeal.

– S.C. OSEJI, J.S.C. Odey v. Alaga (2021) – SC.9/2021

Was this dictum helpful?

SHARE ON

APPEAL CANNOT BE DECIDED WHERE NOTICE OF APPEAL IS COMPETENT

My lords, it is of utmost importance and I so bear it in my mind that it is only when a notice of appeal is competent that a determination of it on the merit will be feasible. In other words, where a notice of appeal is incompetent, it is liable to be terminated in limine and it would be of no moment no matter how meritorious it would have been if it were to be considered on the merit. In law, one of the most essential requirement or condition precedent for the competence of an appeal to be determined on the merit by the Court is a valid notice and grounds of appeal, in the absence of which such an appeal would be rendered incompetent and thus incapable of being determined on the merit by this Court for without jurisdiction there can be no competence of any cause or matter or appeal before the Court. It has long been settled in our law that jurisdiction is a fundamental one and thus can be raised at any stage of the proceedings, even on appeal for the first time as in the instant appeal by either of the parties or even by the Court suo motu and once raised it must first be determined one way or the other by the Court before any other issue touching on the merit or otherwise of the respective cases of the parties can be enquired and be determined on the merit by the Court. This is so because in the absence of jurisdiction there can be no competence in the 1st Respondent’s claim to be heard and determined on the merit, since jurisdiction is the life blood of every cause or action and thus where the requisite jurisdiction is found to be lacking, that is indeed the end of the matter. See Madukolu v. Nkemdilim (1962) 2 All NLR 581.

— B.A. Georgewill, JCA. University of Lagos v. Mbaso (2018) – CA/L/775/2016

Was this dictum helpful?

A NOTICE OF APPEAL IS AN INITIATING PROCESS

A notice of appeal is an initiating process by which a higher Court is invited to review the decision of a lower Court to determine whether on a proper consideration of the facts placed before the Court and the applicable law to the said facts, the lower Court arrived at a correct decision … The filing of a notice of appeal is a necessary prerequisite to the hearing of an appeal. Where leave is required a notice of appeal filed without leave is incurably defective and such notice cannot be amended. See Popoola vs. Adeyemo (1992) 8 NWLR (pt. 257) 1 SC, Abidoye vs Alawode (2001) 13 WRN 71 SC.

— W.S.N. Onnoghen, JSC. SPDC v Agbara (2019) – SC.731/2017(R)

Was this dictum helpful?

A COMPETENT NOTICE OF APPEAL

A competent notice of appeal is like having the right key for a particular door. The notice of appeal is the key to the door to this Court. Without the right key, any effort to gain entrance through the door is an exercise in futility. It is void and therefore a nullity. In the immortal words of Lord Denning, MR in McFoy vs UAC (1961) 3 ALL ER 169 @ 172: “If an act is void, then it is in law, a nullity. It is not only bad but incurably bad … And every proceeding which is founded on it is also bad and incurably bad. You cannot put something on nothing and expect it to stay there. It will collapse.” See also: Madukolu Vs Nkemdilim (1962) 2 SCNLR 341; Skenconsult Vs Ukey (1981) 1 SC 6.

— K.M.O. Kekere-Ekun, JSC. Francis v. FRN (2020) – SC.810/2014

Was this dictum helpful?

MORE THAN ONE NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED WITHIN TIME IS VALID

Tukur Vs Government of Gongola State (1988) 1 NSCC 30 at 36: It is more correct to say that the Rules of the Court of Appeal did not expressly provide for the filing of more than one notice. The Rules were silent on the Issue and it is therefore my opinion that every notice of appeal filed within time is valid. If more than one notices are filed within time, the others may be superfluous but not invalid. All the notices combined have been in exercise of a right of appeal. They may have stated different grounds which if permissible in law, gives validity and competency to the notice. Where several notices of appeal have been validly filed, I cannot see anything preventing an application for leave to consolidate them into one or for withdrawal of all except one.

Was this dictum helpful?

INCOMPETENT NOTICE OF APPEAL CANNOT BE AMENDED

Any notice of appeal that is incompetent cannot be amended because you cannot put something on nothing and expect it to stand.

– K.B. Aka’ahs, JSC. SPDC v Agbara (2019) – SC.731/2017(R)

Was this dictum helpful?

INCOMPETENT NOTICE OF APPEAL WILL BE STRUCK OUT

Where it is established that a Notice of Appeal, the live wire of an appeal, is incompetent, this Court will have no jurisdiction to entertain such appeal. An incompetent Notice of Appeal suffers one natural consequential fate, which is, its liability to be struck out for incompetence. In this appeal, the Notice of Appeal which was filed outside the time required by law deserves no other fate than to be struck out. See Onwuzulike V. The State (2020)10 NWLR (Pt.173) 91 at 102 paras F-G. In the case of Enyibros Food Processing Company (Nig.) Limited V. N.D.l.C. (2021)16 NWLR (Pt. 1800) 559 at 571 paras B – D this Court per Eko, JSC (Rtd) stated the position of an incompetent Notice of Appeal thus:  “My Lords because only a competent appeal, validly filed, enures to the appellant to invoke the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, vested in it by Section 233(1) of the Constitution, to hear and determine appeals from the Court of Appeal, when an appeal appears to be incompetent, it will be properly interrogated to ensure that we do not proceed in an exercise that will eventually be a nullity as well. Madukolu V. Nkemdilim (1962)1 All NIR 587; (1962)2 SCNLR 341, Bronik Motors Limited and Anor V. Wema Bank Limited (1983)1 SCNLR 296, C.B.N. V. Okojie (2015) 5-6 SC (Pt.ii)173; (2015)14 NWLR (Pt.1479)231.” 

— J.I. Okoro JSC. Kingsley Okoro V. The State (SC.85/2013, 17 Feb 2023)

Was this dictum helpful?

No more related dictum to show.